The enlightenment was a time of knowledge, and people being free with thoughts and thinking about spirtuality and the world around them. Art and literature were means of expressing views about God and science and beliefs about the world. Freedom, beauty and truth were all themes of the time and knowledge was freely shared and discussed.
The Enlightenment,which rose out of struggles over freedom of belief and thought,was a philosophical movement of the 18th century that specificaly emphasized the use of reason to scrutinize previously accepted doctrines-this period brought about many humanitarian reforms along with 'humanism' and atheistic reformation (etc).
The Enlightment Period came to rise during the Eighteenth centry. It brought a time for new beginings and a different outlook and defferent views. It brought light to dark. It brought a new way of learning and teachings.
I have interpreted the enlightment period as being a time in which the world's people were coming out of an age of being oppressed and were able to express themselves and sentiments that they had been feeling at the time. Many in different nations finally felt they can express their feelings about their government and rebelled against them. Reason was taken in almost universally with the constant abolition of slavery. The morality of an action was actually taken into consideration as governments and their publics began to respect human life, at least to the point of releasing slaves.
The Enlightenment period was a time of revival of individual liberty for all humans. This time was the focus of sheding light on dark areas of the world. Individualism and reasoning were encouraged rather than smothered.
Well. Where to begin. The Enlightenment period really did alot for our lives today, and mine personally. If it was not for the enlightenment period i might not be able persue an acting career. The Enlightenment period really opened up alot of opportunity for the arts in general. And if we didnt have art, we wouldnt have television shows, music and just the entertainment industry itself might not exist as we know it. Just some poor imatation that lets us know everyday that the world sucks. So Im very grateful for the advances that the Enlightment period has made for my life personally, because we are able to express ourselves and how we feel. With that alone i think it makes others more comfortable to express themselves and feel better about life. Maybe to see the brighter side of things.
The Enlightment is the reformation in religion, which happened over a period of time. 16th and 17th century war, spain and the holy empire, which were shattered vs. Farnceand England who are stronger in power. Dutch and English forces defeated spain. Loise XIV and the protestant Europe of Britain emerged as the leading nation. Its also the Idea of fundemental human quality. Free thinking.
The Enlightenment in my opionion was a movement of change for the people of that time. There were intellectual and philisophical developments. This impacted their moral, social and political values. This moved people to be self governed, have individual rights along with freedom of natural law and thought. The Enlightenment is a period of departure fromthe middles ages, the church, human discorse and freedom of religion, modernism, and socialism. Basically this is a time of change and advancement for the better.
The Enlightenment period was a time of growth in which the people made advances in many scientific and cultural aspects that had remianed dormant and unprogressive during the Dark Ages. It was during this time that people became began to experiment with new thought processes and open their minds and think for themselves rather then blindly following those that that were believed to be more intellegant than themselves. Governments were overthrown and the arts flourished. However it is not to say that there was no repression at all, the Inquistions and Slavery are proof of this.
The Enlightment period occurred during the Eighteenth Centruy some time between 1715 and 1789. During this time not everything was good and well. Many people had difficulties and struggles in their lives, especially when speaking of the African American population. Many African Americans were sold into slavery and not able to live free and happy lives. In 1807 Britain abolished slavery causing less pressure on blacks, however slavery was still rampid in the United States and Saudi Arabia until many years later. By the year 1865, the United States finally abolished slavery, making the country stronger and united. The eighteenth century also consisted of a rise of science, individualism and reason. This period was not all bad. Revolution and the rights of the individual were stressed on many.
Throughout the Enlightment Period, society experienced revolution and the rise of individualism as well as reason. The eighteenth century acts as the turning point to the Enlightment Period, and is also described as the Age of Reason, or the Century of Light. There were various segments of the Enlightment Period that society experienced, such as the Baroque Period and the Neo-Classical Period. Baroque was a time of massive detail in structures of buildings and things were seen as gawdy. The Neo-Classical Period acted as the revival of the classical period and its designs. Despite its name, the Enlightment Period was not fully light and joy. The Inquisition occured during this time which brought sorrow and hardship. Slavery became an issue and stayed throughout the eighteenth century. Slavery was not completely abolished by all countries until the middle of the nineteenth century. The Enlightment Period experienced various changes and is marked important in history.
The Enlightenment was a period in which reason and values began to rapidly change. The idea of absolutism began to be an idea of the past and warranted the commoner within society to question the motives of the ruling King. "Divine right" also came into question. Through many philosophers and citizens, the new overshadowing value became reason for the individual. Coming out of the Dark Ages, this was a time period during the seventeenth and eighteenth century that shifted towards thought, reason, and question for one's beliefs and thought instead of being oppressed by the King/Church. This was a period of progress even though there were problems within society like slavery and the several inquisitions. For these reasons, this was a time when the social contract become important among men to have the right to govern themselves. This eventually led to the formation of a Parliament rule accompanied with a more "admired" King.
Enlightment was time when people began to think outside of what they had been taught or preached. It was no longer a time where one thing was said and everyone just assumed it was the truth. People were encouraged to make sense of what they were told and seek out the answers for themselves. They began to question the things that they were taught, and understand that there is more than one path to follow. People were able to share there different beliefs and findings with others freely. Writers were able to share their literary work with others without fear. Religious tolerance was another change. There was an acceptance of different beliefs, and the people who took part in those different beliefs. Literacy was no longer for men of wealth, it was encouraged for all to become literate no matter the gender or status. The right to human equality also came during the Enlightment Period. This brought on the belief that people should not have their own private property. All should be entitled to own land not just those of a certain status. More importantly the right to human equality help bring an end to slavery.
The Enlightenment Period, was a time in the age of history which should be appreciated. It was a time when knowledge, technology, and cities started growing. As these thing grew, so did the field of philosophers. The philosophers started writing about whether King's and Queen's truly had "divine right." The constant evaluation of divine right, soon caused people to rise against their rulers. In literature, philosophers wrote about their beliefs and encouraged others to realize that rulers' did not have any right to opress their people. Soon events such as the French, English, and American revolutions erupted. The Enlightenment age is a period in humankind which was inevitable, and also a turning point. If this had not happened, then France, England, and America, as well as other countries would not be the same that they are today.
The Enlightenment Period or "the Age of Reason", accurs fromt he English Revolution to French Revolution (1600-1800). It was also a time of freedom of beliefs, reason, science, and encyclopedic knowledge; even though some of them were censored through governments. Absoltism was also a big problem in many areas. Overall, the Enlightment Period was a time of philosophical thinking of the individual.
The enlightenment period was an age of reason and innovation. Many great thinkers and philosophers were products of the Enlightenment period. These authors used much satire in their writings to get their point across to the public. For the first time, people bagan to think for themselves and question the teachings of others. This era helped introduce science into society. Much controversy began on the subject of science v. faith.
During the Enlightment period people begin to experiences a rise in their individuality. It was also called the age of reason which was a time were people had freedom of their own beliefs reason, science, and encyclopedic knowledge. This period brought forward a new way of thinking.
The Dali Lama studies and does all types of research through books, reading to understand all the things that have happened in the world and why they have happened. He is a very intelligent man, believing in all types of sciences, but also a very strong believer in faith, and the teaching. When there is a contradiction between the two, he normally chooses the learning’s and teachings of faith. Descartes spend most of his life doing research and traveling to receive information, and to better his understandings. Realizing his teachers had different ways of teaching and different interpretations on all the material, he decides to go out and learn for him. He believes that everything that is learned should be learned for oneself. Nothing should just be accepted, one has to determine for them if it is right or wrong, no one can make that decision for someone else. The Dali Lama states that greed is a major downfall to today’s society, especially in America, the people of Tibet do not have the greed, therefore it does not affect them, as it does American and other large nations. This all goes back to Descartes thinking, the people of Tibet are not fully aware of the living standards in America, so therefore it does not affect them personally. They have grown to be happy and thankful for what they do have. Most everything they own they made themselves so it brings more of a satisfaction. Kant is speaking of the enlightenment and everything entitled to it, saying obey but do not conform to the surroundings. The Dali Lama is asked how he can maintain such a way of non-violence even when there is so much threat. He is doing nothing but obeying just like he is supposed to do. He believes his is nothing more than a normal man in the country, he does not believe he should have so much attention, he would just rather worship, obey, and study what he chooses to study. Countries should go on being just as they have been in the past and throughout the years, changing and trying to conform is not what the people need.
There are both many similarities and differences among the Dali Lama and the writings of Kant and Descartes. One obvious difference is that I would venture to say that the two authors do not practice the same religion as the Dali Lama. But at the same time many of the similar values that these three men possess come from their morals, ethics, or religion. In comparing the Dali Lama with Descartes, you find similarities in how each man thinks of himself; both men do not feel that they are better than any other person. Descartes writes “For myself, I have fancied my mind to be in any respect more perfect than those of the generality. . .” (Literature) The Dali Lama believes this same idea; he goes as far as riding coach when travleling. Kant’s writings on Enlightenment somewhat correlate with the Dali Lama’s situation in Tibet. Kant claims that the people of his era were unable to think for themselves because society would not allow it. In a twisted way, Tibet natives are in the same situation with the Republic of China. Kant and the Dali Lama both play similar roles in standing up and being a voice of reason. All three men believed in reason and thinking for themselves; even with the Dali Lama being the religious figure that he is, he claims to sometimes choose science over religion. All three of these men urge people to listen but develop their own interpretation of the teachings. The last similarity mentioned of the three is the idea of money. All fought for a society where there was a happy median between the rich and poor. The Dali Lama claims that the poor are actually should sometimes be considered the rich.
Mariah. . . since your the only other person that has posted i get to critique how terrible your post was. . . jk. No I agree with much of what you said. By the way thanks for actually remembering why the Dali Lama thought the poor were actually the rich. I definitely had that but also forgot why. Also in your description of the Dali Lama I have to add. . .besides possessing great faith and intelligence like you said. . . when he gets really excited or passionate about something his voice gets very high and squeaky. Sorry i thought it was funny and everyone should know about it. All in all we kinda had the same ideas with poor being the rich and each man being a man of reason, etc. But I hope this response isn't suppose to be too formal because I'm kind of rambling on. . .
Kant and Descartes had views very similar to the Dali Lama. Both Kant and the Dali Lama believed that violence and direct overthrow of authority does not solve any problems. Kant believed in individual responsibility and free exchange of ideas to break down political walls. The Dali Lama also advocates using words and kindness to make change instead of violence. Kant also believed that the people in his time were unable to make decisions or think for themselves. This is similar to what is happening to the people of Tibet. It has gone so far that the Chinese are now taking over the role of finding the next Dali Lama, even though he has already been chosen by the current one. They are making decisions for the people and not allowing them to think for themselves. They even prosecute people for speaking of the Dali Lama or having a picture of him. This all relates to the people of Kant's time being unable to think for themselves because everyone around them was telling them what to do and how to think. Descartes believed that wealth and power do not make you happy. The Dali Lama also believes that those who are poor are happier than those with money. They have only enough to get what they want, and this satisfies them. Those who have money are always wanting more, and thus are never happy. The Dali Lama thinks in the same terms of the Enlightenment in that he usually believes science over religion when he is given proven facts. He is also an advocate of the oppressed, and considers himself just another normal man, all typical thinking during the Enlightenment period.
I agree with your writing. I really liked the way you compared Kant to the natives of Tibet and their struggle with China. You formed your comparison with good use of quotes and references to the movie. I like the point of view you were coming from, how you tied Kant, Descartes, and the Dali Lama all together and stating their similarities and differences. Each was described in a very good way.
Even though most of the world would deem the Dalai Lama as a holy representative of peace, he himself somewhat would humbly disagree and disclaim that calling himself only a normal human being. His thoughts and insights can be seen as being much different than say another religious ‘leader’. Rene Descartes disagreed with many of his professors over their teachings since many of his educators contradicted with one another. Due to this he took it upon himself to research his own information. The same can be said of the Dalai Lama. It’s easy to see that he’s opposed to China’s censorship of information since he does not rely on others telling him information, but he does the research for himself. Books he has read vary from Biochemistry to Neurology. The dissatisfaction over government controlling its publics thoughts and censorship of information was something both the Dalai Lama and Kant could agree to. Even though Tibet was taken by force and it’s people were being tortured and killed the Dalai Lama still maintained that violence would not help the situation any more and that it was and endless mean, something Kant could attest to. The most interesting thing was the Dalai Lama’s comment on the poor and rich. It goes with the saying, ‘More money more problems’. Those who are poor see their situation in a more positive light since they know full well things could be much worse, while those who are rich worry about losing their fortune and are focused on acquiring more and more. This, according to the Dalai Lama, makes the poor man rich in his mind, and the rich man poor in his. Descartes would agree with this view. All three of these individuals go along with the whole idea of the Enlightenment period due to their agreement on the necessity of individuals to think for themselves and express those very thoughts.
After watching “The 10 Questions of The Dali Lama” I saw that it was very similar to the writing of Kant and Descartes. Both the two took their religious aspect into their way of living their lives. Neither of the men saw themselves different or richer then those around them, just as normal as anyone else. When Dali Lama refused to ride in first class it showed how sincere he really was because the average person would have took the opportunity. The Enlightment and the genocide going on in Tibet were another connection between the two. The Enlightment period was a time when people begun to think on their own and explore their own ideas without fear of what others would say. Kant account of The Enlightment was the society controlled the minds of the people. On the other have Tibet was controlled by China Government. The people of Tibet had no voice or freedom of speech and if they decided to go against the government they would be putting their lives in jeopardy. Both men spoke of peace and happiness. Kant speaks of the “voice of reason” as the way of dealing with society. Dali Lama also speaks of non violence, but the people of Tibet know no other way to response to the treatment of China. Dali Lama uses his religious to help deal with his rational thinking. Both of the men clarify one last point, which is the fact that money can not buy your happiness. Kant says that the rich just keep wanting more and more, which they are never satisfied. Dali Lama feels that the poor are happier then those richer, because the poor are just satisfied with having enough to get them by. Both men have the same idea of peace being the way to communicate amongst one another.
Angel - You really drew an illustration with your description of the Dali Lama, along with Kant and Descartes. I agree with many things you have written, it is well written and very understandable from any view point. You have good use of examples for each of the men, really summing up who they are and what they believe and stand for. Each man is clearly linked together from the Dali Lama’s responses to how the authors view the matter of the question.
I agree with almost everyone writing. I thought that mostly everyone agreed that Dali Lama and Kant believed that violence would not solve any of the problems in society. I thought that the similarities came across very clearly to everyone, but I especially liked how Mariah pointed out the way that they researched and learned how to understand other places in the world.
After reading about Descartes and watching "10 Questions for the Dalai Lama" I noticed that a strong similarity between the two was that they both sought out the answers to their own questions personally rather than simply taking advice from those who were supposed to be more knowledgeable in the subjects in question. The Dalai Lama spent many hours researching different subjects including science and when the ideas he came across contradicted religion and proved to be correct he tended to choose to side with those ideas. This is very similar to when Descartes received contradicting theories from various teachers that disagreed with each other he would go discover for himself what the correct information was. One of the Dalai Lama’s biggest beliefs was that truth and information should not be hidden and that is was the most powerful tool in the world. This is shown through his disapproval through the censorship of what he stands for by the Chinese government to their people. Kant would concur with the Dalai Lama on the wrongness of not disclosing information to the people and not even allowing them to discover it for themselves. The Dalai Lama and Kant also encourage religious tolerance and the free exchange of ideas in order to help the growth of individuals, and to use kindness and words as opposed to violence and guns. The Dalai Lama views guns as a temporary fix that will not withstand the unveiling of the truth so therefore not as strong. A difference is that though is that in the time of Kant he believed that the people were unable to think for themselves and make their own decisions, when during our time in Tibet they people have been able to yet that right has been taken away by the Chinese government so that it can have more control over what the Tibetans are doing.
I really like how you discuss the way that the Dalai Lama talks about non-conformity and the comparison to the way Kant says obey but not conform to the surroundings. If you noticed in the video it would talk quite a bit about how the Dalai Lama's political views and ideas were held in high esteem by those around the world for their uniqueness and individuality. He even won the Nobel peace prize for his teaching of non-violent protest methods. Another way in which the Dalai Lama is not having his people conform is by making it a point to preserve the culture of the people ahead of making sure they are industrialized or rich. He believes that true wealth and richness comes spiritually rather than monetarily, which goes against almost everything we are taught. Most people spend their whole lives trying to fit in while both of these people speak out about being different.
Tierra . . . we made much of the same observations including the Dali Lama riding coach. . . I did like the connection between the genocide and enlightment. . . i didn't really connect those until reading your post
Jerad You bring up and interesting point when you say the Dalai Lama clams that the poor are actually the ‘rich’. I think that the point the Dalai Lama was trying to stress was that society (especially in America) puts to much stress on money as defining substance on being poor or being rich. Because just having money in the bank is not the ticket to happiness and that is the message he is trying to send. The common people of Tibet do not have fountains of wealth yet they smile and enjoy life. The key to true richness is in a strong sense of spirituality, close family and love for all life. And all the things in life that really matter can not be bought. The only money that we really require is just enough to survive and fufill our basic necessities. So 'richness' is not always measured in the cost of an item, but what fulfillment it gives you in life spiritually.
The society and people today put almost all of the worries and cares in money instead of like the Dali Lama and the search for enlightenment. Kant believed that we as human beings have the duty to act in a good and civil manor; we have the unspoken duty to be kind good natured people. The Dali Lama strives to be at peace with himself and the world. To get caught up in the evils and distractions of the world is to live your life wrong and poorly. Many people today get too caught up in greed and money, but the Dali Lama and many people of the Buddhist faith believed that the poor and less fortunate were more grateful for what they had an led a better life. Both Descartes and Kant stressed on the importance of religion in their lives. They understood the lifechanging experiences one may enjoy throughout the exploration of their faith and beliefs. The Dali Lama saw the unimportance of holding on to worldly things and how things are not permanent. Preserve that which you hold close in faith through cultural heritage. Life is changing and unstable and through the belief of the Dali Lama, people must inderstand what truly is of importance. The Enlightenment period was a time of change and the minds of people were broadening to new aspects on life; Descartes and Kant were taking many of these things into account.
The fourteenth Dali Lama, Kant, and Descartes all share similar philosophical and scientific ideals. Although the Dali Lama is from the more modern twentieth century, several of his religious and moral codes resemble the ideas of the historical enlightenment thinkers, Kant and Descartes. All three of these intellectually revered men produce postulates formed on the basis of environment, reason, will power, judgment, and tradition. Kant and Descartes, being from the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, dealt with a more diluted and experimental form of philosophy. Both of these writers/philosophers urged people to not rely on religion, but to instead ask why things were a certain way. Through this type of questioning, people began to produce logical explanations and reveal true answers to a wide variety of issues. The Dali Lama, although a religious leader, urged the use of science and reason to arrive at a conclusion. Unlike the Catholic Church officials before the enlightenment era, the Dali Lama views modern technology as a necessity in today’s world. All three men revere calm reason as the only means to solve an issue. Kant and Descartes’ reverence is driven by a more mathematical, scientific, and philosophical means. Somewhat differing from the previous philosophers mentioned, the Dali Lama’s call for calm reason deals with the issue of the oppressive Chinese occupation of Tibet, as well as other warring issues around the world. The point that all three of these men reach is that by using sensibility and logic free of emotion, major and minor dilemmas can be resolved.
The Enlightenment Period was an era fueled by reason, sensibility, logic, and the expansion of the sciences. Philosophers, scientists, mathematicians, and authors made progress by taking the classical Greco roman ideals and expanding them further. Contrary to the ideas of the Church, these Progressives urged for the common man to think for himself and branch away from the accepted ideas of the time period. As history dictates, during the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, the Enlightenment Period, new inventions, areas of study, and even new political perspectives were formulated.
I agree with your stream of thought regarding the expansion of individual liberty and thought. “Dark areas” is a rather ambiguous way to touch on the vast array of subjects that were discovered and enhanced by this new style of thought. Science, history, mathematics, literature, art and theater were just a few of the “dark areas” where free-thinkers aspired to shed light on. I also like that you mentioned the acceptance of these methods of thought. It is true that the majority of these ideas were encouraged by the majority of people. Primarily, most of the intellectual smothering occurred as the Catholic Church tried to cling to the traditional ideas, and flush out the modern views. Part of this revival that you speak of occurred in the religious sect of study. Martin Luther ignited the Protestant Reformation during this period, resulting in a new widespread religious fervor.
I really like that you tied in a more political aspect of the Enlightenment Period. I actually didn’t draw many of the conclusions that were reached in your blog. Thanks for “enlightening” me,
The Dali Lama is not only a religious figure for the Tibetian people but also a political dignitary who is seen to have been born in order to "teach humanity". When comparing the Dali Lama to such notary philosophers as Kant and Descart we need not look far in order to find similarities. The three men mentioned are members of diverse societies that consist of a poor and rich populace;Kant,Descartes and the Dali Lama had almost the same comparitive 'theory of perception' when it came down to measuring the people by their own doings rather than their financial personalities. Kant was well known for the idea of a "categorical imperative",which he derived from the much broader concept of 'duty'. The 'categorical imperative' is based on the belief that moral law is a principle of reason itself,and is not based on "contingent facts about the world". Just as the Dali Lama stressed moral obligations to humanity and society,Kant assessed that notion and created a theory to cover it, soundly. When comparing Descartes and the Dali Lama we should look at the concept of 'cogito ergo sum' (I think therefore I am),which was made concrete by Descartes in the early 1700's/late 1600's. The makeup of the Tibetian society is not based on what is seen or heard 'round the world,but instead upon the present sorroundings - they live in their current situation based on what transpires around them and thus they live to satisfy their more spiritual,rather than monitery,needs. All three men,Descart,Kant and the Dali Lama not only improved and advanced the concept of 'duty' but reassessed the meaning of the phrase "..to be rich". No longer can we place and fallacious personality on 'the rich',we must instead focus on those that have so little yet live so much.
There are so many similarites between Descartes, Kant, and the Dahli Lama. Kant and the Dahli Lama both believed that violence didnt solve anything, and that it is better to solve things with words rather than violence. Another similarity was that they both were ready for the people to be able to think and act for themselves. Another similarity that they all held was that money wasn't everything, and that even the poorest of people had more happiness than that of someone in a higher class.
Descartes believed in knowing the difference between what is the truth and what is error. Which is a belief shared by the Dali Lama. He has been know to make a judgement on something but when he is wrong he is able to admit when he's wrong. They all believed in making sense of what they been told or taught. Going out and finding the truth for themselves. Being able to decide for themselves without having others influence their decisions. Religious tolerance is also an idea they share. The Dali Lama believes in being tolerant of other religious beliefs. When the Dali Lama met with Muslims he went there with openess and understanding, and he was able to see that there are Muslims who are open-minded. By becoming tolerant of different religions he believes harmony will follow. Kant and Descartes believe in human equality amongst all. Not just those of certain sexes or class. Human equality is also something that the Dali Lama still practices today. He is well known throughout the world yet he still lives on ten dollars a day. The money he recieved from the Noble Prize he gave it to charity. He believes he has what he needs and doesn't require anymore. The Dali Lama felt he did not deserve the award and has clearly stated throughout the interview he acknowledges himself as just an ordinary simple monk. Everyone is created equal and no one person is higher than another. The use of science is something the Descates and Dali Lama share as well. Descartes was intrigued by math and sciences. He was able to apply algebra to geometry. When the Dali Lama is faced with a question of science vs religion he stands on the side of science. These beliefs and practices where started in the Enlightment period but are still strongly practiced by the Dali Lama who believes firmly in these ideas.
After reading about Descartes and Kant’s ideas, and watching the movie “10 Questions for the Dalai Lama” I came to conclude that the ideas represented in the movie, especially the Dalai Lama’s ideas are very similar to the ones of Descartes and Kant. All three of them incline a lot towards the Enlightenment period, this was a period of freedom of people’s own beliefs, science was introduced to society, and every individual became more educated. Another similarity linking them is that all of them believed that violence and strict overpower was not the right way to approach and solve problems. The Dalai Lama, being the sacred stature that he is, he claims to occasionally prefer science over religion, he also inclines toward vocabulary and humbleness instead of violence, also, Kant claimed that the people from his time were not capable to make decisions for their own because society would prohibit it, and this is just what is happening to the people in Tibet. China wants to make decisions for them and handle their problems restricting them from thinking for themselves; they even penalize anybody who speaks of the Dalai Lama or has pictures of him. When asked why the poor were happy and the rich were sad, the Dalai Lama replied with the saying “more money more problems”. The Dalai Lama explains that the poor are happier for the reason that they are pleased with what they have and they know how to appreciate it, also, the poor are very optimistic about their situation because they know that things could be a lot worse and that they have more to win than they have to lose. On the other hand, the rich society live full of pressure and stress because the wealthier they become, the more stuff they want, which at the same time, having a lot of money makes them afraid of losing it all. So, according to the Dalai Lama and Descartes in agreement, this makes the poor rich in his mind and the rich poor in his.
43 comments:
1)Compare the comments of the Dali Lama in "10 Questions for the Dali Lama" to the writings you read from Descartes and Kant (300 words).
2) Respond to two other postings (minimum 200 words each response).
Hi All:
Describe the Enlightment Period in your own words.
Respond to two other students' descriptions (200 words) agreeing and disagreeing.
Have fun!
The enlightenment was a time of knowledge, and people being free with thoughts and thinking about spirtuality and the world around them. Art and literature were means of expressing views about God and science and beliefs about the world. Freedom, beauty and truth were all themes of the time and knowledge was freely shared and discussed.
The Enlightenment,which rose out of struggles over freedom of belief and thought,was a philosophical movement of the 18th century that specificaly emphasized the use of reason to scrutinize previously accepted doctrines-this period brought about many humanitarian reforms along with 'humanism' and atheistic reformation (etc).
The Enlightment Period came to rise during the Eighteenth centry. It brought a time for new beginings and a different outlook and defferent views. It brought light to dark. It brought a new way of learning and teachings.
Armando Villarreal
I have interpreted the enlightment period as being a time in which the world's people were coming out of an age of being oppressed and were able to express themselves and sentiments that they had been feeling at the time. Many in different nations finally felt they can express their feelings about their government and rebelled against them. Reason was taken in almost universally with the constant abolition of slavery. The morality of an action was actually taken into consideration as governments and their publics began to respect human life, at least to the point of releasing slaves.
The Enlightenment period was a time of revival of individual liberty for all humans. This time was the focus of sheding light on dark areas of the world. Individualism and reasoning were encouraged rather than smothered.
Well. Where to begin. The Enlightenment period really did alot for our lives today, and mine personally. If it was not for the enlightenment period i might not be able persue an acting career. The Enlightenment period really opened up alot of opportunity for the arts in general. And if we didnt have art, we wouldnt have television shows, music and just the entertainment industry itself might not exist as we know it. Just some poor imatation that lets us know everyday that the world sucks. So Im very grateful for the advances that the Enlightment period has made for my life personally, because we are able to express ourselves and how we feel. With that alone i think it makes others more comfortable to express themselves and feel better about life. Maybe to see the brighter side of things.
The Enlightment is the reformation in religion, which happened over a period of time. 16th and 17th century war, spain and the holy empire, which were shattered vs. Farnceand England who are stronger in power. Dutch and English forces defeated spain. Loise XIV and the protestant Europe of Britain emerged as the leading nation. Its also the Idea of fundemental human quality. Free thinking.
The Enlightenment in my opionion was a movement of change for the people of that time. There were intellectual and philisophical developments. This impacted their moral, social and political values. This moved people to be self governed, have individual rights along with freedom of natural law and thought. The Enlightenment is a period of departure fromthe middles ages, the church, human discorse and freedom of religion, modernism, and socialism. Basically this is a time of change and advancement for the better.
The Enlightenment period was a time of growth in which the people made advances in many scientific and cultural aspects that had remianed dormant and unprogressive during the Dark Ages. It was during this time that people became began to experiment with new thought processes and open their minds and think for themselves rather then blindly following those that that were believed to be more intellegant than themselves. Governments were overthrown and the arts flourished. However it is not to say that there was no repression at all, the Inquistions and Slavery are proof of this.
The Enlightment period occurred during the Eighteenth Centruy some time between 1715 and 1789. During this time not everything was good and well. Many people had difficulties and struggles in their lives, especially when speaking of the African American population. Many African Americans were sold into slavery and not able to live free and happy lives. In 1807 Britain abolished slavery causing less pressure on blacks, however slavery was still rampid in the United States and Saudi Arabia until many years later. By the year 1865, the United States finally abolished slavery, making the country stronger and united. The eighteenth century also consisted of a rise of science, individualism and reason. This period was not all bad. Revolution and the rights of the individual were stressed on many.
Throughout the Enlightment Period, society experienced revolution and the rise of individualism as well as reason. The eighteenth century acts as the turning point to the Enlightment Period, and is also described as the Age of Reason, or the Century of Light. There were various segments of the Enlightment Period that society experienced, such as the Baroque Period and the Neo-Classical Period. Baroque was a time of massive detail in structures of buildings and things were seen as gawdy. The Neo-Classical Period acted as the revival of the classical period and its designs. Despite its name, the Enlightment Period was not fully light and joy. The Inquisition occured during this time which brought sorrow and hardship. Slavery became an issue and stayed throughout the eighteenth century. Slavery was not completely abolished by all countries until the middle of the nineteenth century. The Enlightment Period experienced various changes and is marked important in history.
The Enlightenment was a period in which reason and values began to rapidly change. The idea of absolutism began to be an idea of the past and warranted the commoner within society to question the motives of the ruling King. "Divine right" also came into question. Through many philosophers and citizens, the new overshadowing value became reason for the individual. Coming out of the Dark Ages, this was a time period during the seventeenth and eighteenth century that shifted towards thought, reason, and question for one's beliefs and thought instead of being oppressed by the King/Church. This was a period of progress even though there were problems within society like slavery and the several inquisitions. For these reasons, this was a time when the social contract become important among men to have the right to govern themselves. This eventually led to the formation of a Parliament rule accompanied with a more "admired" King.
Enlightment was time when people began to think outside of what they had been taught or preached. It was no longer a time where one thing was said and everyone just assumed it was the truth. People were encouraged to make sense of what they were told and seek out the answers for themselves. They began to question the things that they were taught, and understand that there is more than one path to follow. People were able to share there different beliefs and findings with others freely. Writers were able to share their literary work with others without fear. Religious tolerance was another change. There was an acceptance of different beliefs, and the people who took part in those different beliefs. Literacy was no longer for men of wealth, it was encouraged for all to become literate no matter the gender or status. The right to human equality also came during the Enlightment Period. This brought on the belief that people should not have their own private property. All should be entitled to own land not just those of a certain status. More importantly the right to human equality help bring an end to slavery.
The Enlightenment Period, was a time in the age of history which should be appreciated. It was a time when knowledge, technology, and cities started growing. As these thing grew, so did the field of philosophers. The philosophers started writing about whether King's and Queen's truly had "divine right." The constant evaluation of divine right, soon caused people to rise against their rulers. In literature, philosophers wrote about their beliefs and encouraged others to realize that rulers' did not have any right to opress their people. Soon events such as the French, English, and American revolutions erupted. The Enlightenment age is a period in humankind which was inevitable, and also a turning point. If this had not happened, then France, England, and America, as well as other countries would not be the same that they are today.
The Enlightenment Period or "the Age of Reason", accurs fromt he English Revolution to French Revolution (1600-1800). It was also a time of freedom of beliefs, reason, science, and encyclopedic knowledge; even though some of them were censored through governments. Absoltism was also a big problem in many areas. Overall, the Enlightment Period was a time of philosophical thinking of the individual.
The Age of Enlightenment, sometimes called the Age of Reason, refers to the time of the guiding intellectual movement.
The enlightenment period was an age of reason and innovation. Many great thinkers and philosophers were products of the Enlightenment period. These authors used much satire in their writings to get their point across to the public. For the first time, people bagan to think for themselves and question the teachings of others. This era helped introduce science into society. Much controversy began on the subject of science v. faith.
During the Enlightment period people begin to experiences a rise in their individuality. It was also called the age of reason which was a time were people had freedom of their own beliefs reason, science, and encyclopedic knowledge. This period brought forward a new way of thinking.
The Dali Lama studies and does all types of research through books, reading to understand all the things that have happened in the world and why they have happened. He is a very intelligent man, believing in all types of sciences, but also a very strong believer in faith, and the teaching. When there is a contradiction between the two, he normally chooses the learning’s and teachings of faith.
Descartes spend most of his life doing research and traveling to receive information, and to better his understandings. Realizing his teachers had different ways of teaching and different interpretations on all the material, he decides to go out and learn for him. He believes that everything that is learned should be learned for oneself. Nothing should just be accepted, one has to determine for them if it is right or wrong, no one can make that decision for someone else. The Dali Lama states that greed is a major downfall to today’s society, especially in America, the people of Tibet do not have the greed, therefore it does not affect them, as it does American and other large nations. This all goes back to Descartes thinking, the people of Tibet are not fully aware of the living standards in America, so therefore it does not affect them personally. They have grown to be happy and thankful for what they do have. Most everything they own they made themselves so it brings more of a satisfaction.
Kant is speaking of the enlightenment and everything entitled to it, saying obey but do not conform to the surroundings. The Dali Lama is asked how he can maintain such a way of non-violence even when there is so much threat. He is doing nothing but obeying just like he is supposed to do. He believes his is nothing more than a normal man in the country, he does not believe he should have so much attention, he would just rather worship, obey, and study what he chooses to study. Countries should go on being just as they have been in the past and throughout the years, changing and trying to conform is not what the people need.
There are both many similarities and differences among the Dali Lama and the writings of Kant and Descartes. One obvious difference is that I would venture to say that the two authors do not practice the same religion as the Dali Lama. But at the same time many of the similar values that these three men possess come from their morals, ethics, or religion. In comparing the Dali Lama with Descartes, you find similarities in how each man thinks of himself; both men do not feel that they are better than any other person. Descartes writes “For myself, I have fancied my mind to be in any respect more perfect than those of the generality. . .” (Literature) The Dali Lama believes this same idea; he goes as far as riding coach when travleling. Kant’s writings on Enlightenment somewhat correlate with the Dali Lama’s situation in Tibet. Kant claims that the people of his era were unable to think for themselves because society would not allow it. In a twisted way, Tibet natives are in the same situation with the Republic of China. Kant and the Dali Lama both play similar roles in standing up and being a voice of reason. All three men believed in reason and thinking for themselves; even with the Dali Lama being the religious figure that he is, he claims to sometimes choose science over religion. All three of these men urge people to listen but develop their own interpretation of the teachings. The last similarity mentioned of the three is the idea of money. All fought for a society where there was a happy median between the rich and poor. The Dali Lama claims that the poor are actually should sometimes be considered the rich.
Mariah. . . since your the only other person that has posted i get to critique how terrible your post was. . . jk. No I agree with much of what you said. By the way thanks for actually remembering why the Dali Lama thought the poor were actually the rich. I definitely had that but also forgot why. Also in your description of the Dali Lama I have to add. . .besides possessing great faith and intelligence like you said. . . when he gets really excited or passionate about something his voice gets very high and squeaky. Sorry i thought it was funny and everyone should know about it. All in all we kinda had the same ideas with poor being the rich and each man being a man of reason, etc. But I hope this response isn't suppose to be too formal because I'm kind of rambling on. . .
Kant and Descartes had views very similar to the Dali Lama. Both Kant and the Dali Lama believed that violence and direct overthrow of authority does not solve any problems. Kant believed in individual responsibility and free exchange of ideas to break down political walls. The Dali Lama also advocates using words and kindness to make change instead of violence. Kant also believed that the people in his time were unable to make decisions or think for themselves. This is similar to what is happening to the people of Tibet. It has gone so far that the Chinese are now taking over the role of finding the next Dali Lama, even though he has already been chosen by the current one. They are making decisions for the people and not allowing them to think for themselves. They even prosecute people for speaking of the Dali Lama or having a picture of him. This all relates to the people of Kant's time being unable to think for themselves because everyone around them was telling them what to do and how to think. Descartes believed that wealth and power do not make you happy. The Dali Lama also believes that those who are poor are happier than those with money. They have only enough to get what they want, and this satisfies them. Those who have money are always wanting more, and thus are never happy. The Dali Lama thinks in the same terms of the Enlightenment in that he usually believes science over religion when he is given proven facts. He is also an advocate of the oppressed, and considers himself just another normal man, all typical thinking during the Enlightenment period.
Jerad-
I agree with your writing. I really liked the way you compared Kant to the natives of Tibet and their struggle with China. You formed your comparison with good use of quotes and references to the movie. I like the point of view you were coming from, how you tied Kant, Descartes, and the Dali Lama all together and stating their similarities and differences. Each was described in a very good way.
Even though most of the world would deem the Dalai Lama as a holy representative of peace, he himself somewhat would humbly disagree and disclaim that calling himself only a normal human being. His thoughts and insights can be seen as being much different than say another religious ‘leader’. Rene Descartes disagreed with many of his professors over their teachings since many of his educators contradicted with one another. Due to this he took it upon himself to research his own information. The same can be said of the Dalai Lama. It’s easy to see that he’s opposed to China’s censorship of information since he does not rely on others telling him information, but he does the research for himself. Books he has read vary from Biochemistry to Neurology. The dissatisfaction over government controlling its publics thoughts and censorship of information was something both the Dalai Lama and Kant could agree to. Even though Tibet was taken by force and it’s people were being tortured and killed the Dalai Lama still maintained that violence would not help the situation any more and that it was and endless mean, something Kant could attest to. The most interesting thing was the Dalai Lama’s comment on the poor and rich. It goes with the saying, ‘More money more problems’. Those who are poor see their situation in a more positive light since they know full well things could be much worse, while those who are rich worry about losing their fortune and are focused on acquiring more and more. This, according to the Dalai Lama, makes the poor man rich in his mind, and the rich man poor in his. Descartes would agree with this view. All three of these individuals go along with the whole idea of the Enlightenment period due to their agreement on the necessity of individuals to think for themselves and express those very thoughts.
After watching “The 10 Questions of The Dali Lama” I saw that it was very similar to the writing of Kant and Descartes. Both the two took their religious aspect into their way of living their lives. Neither of the men saw themselves different or richer then those around them, just as normal as anyone else. When Dali Lama refused to ride in first class it showed how sincere he really was because the average person would have took the opportunity. The Enlightment and the genocide going on in Tibet were another connection between the two. The Enlightment period was a time when people begun to think on their own and explore their own ideas without fear of what others would say. Kant account of The Enlightment was the society controlled the minds of the people. On the other have Tibet was controlled by China Government. The people of Tibet had no voice or freedom of speech and if they decided to go against the government they would be putting their lives in jeopardy. Both men spoke of peace and happiness. Kant speaks of the “voice of reason” as the way of dealing with society. Dali Lama also speaks of non violence, but the people of Tibet know no other way to response to the treatment of China. Dali Lama uses his religious to help deal with his rational thinking. Both of the men clarify one last point, which is the fact that money can not buy your happiness. Kant says that the rich just keep wanting more and more, which they are never satisfied. Dali Lama feels that the poor are happier then those richer, because the poor are just satisfied with having enough to get them by. Both men have the same idea of peace being the way to communicate amongst one another.
Angel -
You really drew an illustration with your description of the Dali Lama, along with Kant and Descartes. I agree with many things you have written, it is well written and very understandable from any view point. You have good use of examples for each of the men, really summing up who they are and what they believe and stand for. Each man is clearly linked together from the Dali Lama’s responses to how the authors view the matter of the question.
I agree with almost everyone writing. I thought that mostly everyone agreed that Dali Lama and Kant believed that violence would not solve any of the problems in society. I thought that the similarities came across very clearly to everyone, but I especially liked how Mariah pointed out the way that they researched and learned how to understand other places in the world.
After reading about Descartes and watching "10 Questions for the Dalai Lama" I noticed that a strong similarity between the two was that they both sought out the answers to their own questions personally rather than simply taking advice from those who were supposed to be more knowledgeable in the subjects in question. The Dalai Lama spent many hours researching different subjects including science and when the ideas he came across contradicted religion and proved to be correct he tended to choose to side with those ideas. This is very similar to when Descartes received contradicting theories from various teachers that disagreed with each other he would go discover for himself what the correct information was. One of the Dalai Lama’s biggest beliefs was that truth and information should not be hidden and that is was the most powerful tool in the world. This is shown through his disapproval through the censorship of what he stands for by the Chinese government to their people. Kant would concur with the Dalai Lama on the wrongness of not disclosing information to the people and not even allowing them to discover it for themselves. The Dalai Lama and Kant also encourage religious tolerance and the free exchange of ideas in order to help the growth of individuals, and to use kindness and words as opposed to violence and guns. The Dalai Lama views guns as a temporary fix that will not withstand the unveiling of the truth so therefore not as strong. A difference is that though is that in the time of Kant he believed that the people were unable to think for themselves and make their own decisions, when during our time in Tibet they people have been able to yet that right has been taken away by the Chinese government so that it can have more control over what the Tibetans are doing.
Mariah
I really like how you discuss the way that the Dalai Lama talks about non-conformity and the comparison to the way Kant says obey but not conform to the surroundings. If you noticed in the video it would talk quite a bit about how the Dalai Lama's political views and ideas were held in high esteem by those around the world for their uniqueness and individuality. He even won the Nobel peace prize for his teaching of non-violent protest methods. Another way in which the Dalai Lama is not having his people conform is by making it a point to preserve the culture of the people ahead of making sure they are industrialized or rich. He believes that true wealth and richness comes spiritually rather than monetarily, which goes against almost everything we are taught. Most people spend their whole lives trying to fit in while both of these people speak out about being different.
Tierra . . . we made much of the same observations including the Dali Lama riding coach. . . I did like the connection between the genocide and enlightment. . . i didn't really connect those until reading your post
Jerad
You bring up and interesting point when you say the Dalai Lama clams that the poor are actually the ‘rich’. I think that the point the Dalai Lama was trying to stress was that society (especially in America) puts to much stress on money as defining substance on being poor or being rich. Because just having money in the bank is not the ticket to happiness and that is the message he is trying to send. The common people of Tibet do not have fountains of wealth yet they smile and enjoy life. The key to true richness is in a strong sense of spirituality, close family and love for all life. And all the things in life that really matter can not be bought. The only money that we really require is just enough to survive and fufill our basic necessities. So 'richness' is not always measured in the cost of an item, but what fulfillment it gives you in life spiritually.
The society and people today put almost all of the worries and cares in money instead of like the Dali Lama and the search for enlightenment. Kant believed that we as human beings have the duty to act in a good and civil manor; we have the unspoken duty to be kind good natured people. The Dali Lama strives to be at peace with himself and the world. To get caught up in the evils and distractions of the world is to live your life wrong and poorly. Many people today get too caught up in greed and money, but the Dali Lama and many people of the Buddhist faith believed that the poor and less fortunate were more grateful for what they had an led a better life. Both Descartes and Kant stressed on the importance of religion in their lives. They understood the lifechanging experiences one may enjoy throughout the exploration of their faith and beliefs. The Dali Lama saw the unimportance of holding on to worldly things and how things are not permanent. Preserve that which you hold close in faith through cultural heritage. Life is changing and unstable and through the belief of the Dali Lama, people must inderstand what truly is of importance. The Enlightenment period was a time of change and the minds of people were broadening to new aspects on life; Descartes and Kant were taking many of these things into account.
The fourteenth Dali Lama, Kant, and Descartes all share similar philosophical and scientific ideals. Although the Dali Lama is from the more modern twentieth century, several of his religious and moral codes resemble the ideas of the historical enlightenment thinkers, Kant and Descartes. All three of these intellectually revered men produce postulates formed on the basis of environment, reason, will power, judgment, and tradition.
Kant and Descartes, being from the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, dealt with a more diluted and experimental form of philosophy. Both of these writers/philosophers urged people to not rely on religion, but to instead ask why things were a certain way. Through this type of questioning, people began to produce logical explanations and reveal true answers to a wide variety of issues. The Dali Lama, although a religious leader, urged the use of science and reason to arrive at a conclusion. Unlike the Catholic Church officials before the enlightenment era, the Dali Lama views modern technology as a necessity in today’s world.
All three men revere calm reason as the only means to solve an issue. Kant and Descartes’ reverence is driven by a more mathematical, scientific, and philosophical means. Somewhat differing from the previous philosophers mentioned, the Dali Lama’s call for calm reason deals with the issue of the oppressive Chinese occupation of Tibet, as well as other warring issues around the world. The point that all three of these men reach is that by using sensibility and logic free of emotion, major and minor dilemmas can be resolved.
The Enlightenment Period was an era fueled by reason, sensibility, logic, and the expansion of the sciences. Philosophers, scientists, mathematicians, and authors made progress by taking the classical Greco roman ideals and expanding them further. Contrary to the ideas of the Church, these Progressives urged for the common man to think for himself and branch away from the accepted ideas of the time period. As history dictates, during the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, the Enlightenment Period, new inventions, areas of study, and even new political perspectives were formulated.
Dear Anonymous,
I agree with your stream of thought regarding the expansion of individual liberty and thought. “Dark areas” is a rather ambiguous way to touch on the vast array of subjects that were discovered and enhanced by this new style of thought. Science, history, mathematics, literature, art and theater were just a few of the “dark areas” where free-thinkers aspired to shed light on. I also like that you mentioned the acceptance of these methods of thought. It is true that the majority of these ideas were encouraged by the majority of people. Primarily, most of the intellectual smothering occurred as the Catholic Church tried to cling to the traditional ideas, and flush out the modern views. Part of this revival that you speak of occurred in the religious sect of study. Martin Luther ignited the Protestant Reformation during this period, resulting in a new widespread religious fervor.
Angel-
I really like that you tied in a more political aspect of the Enlightenment Period. I actually didn’t draw many of the conclusions that were reached in your blog. Thanks for “enlightening” me,
The Dali Lama is not only a religious figure for the Tibetian people but also a political dignitary who is seen to have been born in order to "teach humanity".
When comparing the Dali Lama to such notary philosophers as Kant and Descart we need not look far in order to find similarities.
The three men mentioned are members of diverse societies that consist of a poor and rich populace;Kant,Descartes and the Dali Lama had almost the same comparitive 'theory of perception' when it came down to measuring the people by their own doings rather than their financial personalities.
Kant was well known for the idea of a "categorical imperative",which he derived from the much broader concept of 'duty'.
The 'categorical imperative' is based on the belief that moral law is a principle of reason itself,and is not based on "contingent facts about the world".
Just as the Dali Lama stressed moral obligations to humanity and society,Kant assessed that notion and created a theory to cover it, soundly.
When comparing Descartes and the Dali Lama we should look at the concept of 'cogito ergo sum' (I think therefore I am),which was made concrete by Descartes in the early 1700's/late 1600's.
The makeup of the Tibetian society is not based on what is seen or heard 'round the world,but instead upon the present sorroundings - they live in their current situation based on what transpires around them and thus they live to satisfy their more spiritual,rather than monitery,needs.
All three men,Descart,Kant and the Dali Lama not only improved and advanced the concept of 'duty' but reassessed the meaning of the phrase "..to be rich". No longer can we place and fallacious personality on 'the rich',we must instead focus on those that have so little yet live so much.
There are so many similarites between Descartes, Kant, and the Dahli Lama. Kant and the Dahli Lama both believed that violence didnt solve anything, and that it is better to solve things with words rather than violence. Another similarity was that they both were ready for the people to be able to think and act for themselves. Another similarity that they all held was that money wasn't everything, and that even the poorest of people had more happiness than that of someone in a higher class.
Descartes believed in knowing the difference between what is the truth and what is error. Which is a belief shared by the Dali Lama. He has been know to make a judgement on something but when he is wrong he is able to admit when he's wrong. They all believed in making sense of what they been told or taught. Going out and finding the truth for themselves. Being able to decide for themselves without having others influence their decisions. Religious tolerance is also an idea they share. The Dali Lama believes in being tolerant of other religious beliefs. When the Dali Lama met with Muslims he went there with openess and understanding, and he was able to see that there are Muslims who are open-minded. By becoming tolerant of different religions he believes harmony will follow. Kant and Descartes believe in human equality amongst all. Not just those of certain sexes or class. Human equality is also something that the Dali Lama still practices today. He is well known throughout the world yet he still lives on ten dollars a day. The money he recieved from the Noble Prize he gave it to charity. He believes he has what he needs and doesn't require anymore. The Dali Lama felt he did not deserve the award and has clearly stated throughout the interview he acknowledges himself as just an ordinary simple monk. Everyone is created equal and no one person is higher than another. The use of science is something the Descates and Dali Lama share as well. Descartes was intrigued by math and sciences. He was able to apply algebra to geometry. When the Dali Lama is faced with a question of science vs religion he stands on the side of science. These beliefs and practices where started in the Enlightment period but are still strongly practiced by the Dali Lama who believes firmly in these ideas.
After reading about Descartes and Kant’s ideas, and watching the movie “10 Questions for the Dalai Lama” I came to conclude that the ideas represented in the movie, especially the Dalai Lama’s ideas are very similar to the ones of Descartes and Kant. All three of them incline a lot towards the Enlightenment period, this was a period of freedom of people’s own beliefs, science was introduced to society, and every individual became more educated. Another similarity linking them is that all of them believed that violence and strict overpower was not the right way to approach and solve problems.
The Dalai Lama, being the sacred stature that he is, he claims to occasionally prefer science over religion, he also inclines toward vocabulary and humbleness instead of violence, also, Kant claimed that the people from his time were not capable to make decisions for their own because society would prohibit it, and this is just what is happening to the people in Tibet. China wants to make decisions for them and handle their problems restricting them from thinking for themselves; they even penalize anybody who speaks of the Dalai Lama or has pictures of him.
When asked why the poor were happy and the rich were sad, the Dalai Lama replied with the saying “more money more problems”. The Dalai Lama explains that the poor are happier for the reason that they are pleased with what they have and they know how to appreciate it, also, the poor are very optimistic about their situation because they know that things could be a lot worse and that they have more to win than they have to lose. On the other hand, the rich society live full of pressure and stress because the wealthier they become, the more stuff they want, which at the same time, having a lot of money makes them afraid of losing it all. So, according to the Dalai Lama and Descartes in agreement, this makes the poor rich in his mind and the rich poor in his.
Post a Comment